Conduct Handbook

1.1 Syracuse University is an institution of higher learning where individual growth and development are fostered, excellence is pursued, and the highest standards of integrity are expected in all areas of Syracuse University is committed to providing an environment where persons are physically safe, property is secure, individual rights of all persons are respected, and education of the highest quality is achieved.

1.2 Oversight of the Student Conduct System has been delegated to and is the responsibility of the Chief Student Experience Officer. Implementation of these procedures is the responsibility of Community Standards. The Conduct Code outlines the behavior that is expected of all students at Syracuse University. Having voluntarily enrolled at Syracuse University, all students have entered into an agreement to abide by the rules and regulations set forth in the Conduct Code and other University The procedures outlined in this Handbook apply to the resolution of alleged misconduct in violation of the Conduct Code or other University policies, as well as any related matters. Academic integrity cases are handled through a separate process administered by the Academic Integrity Office. Each student is responsible for conforming their conduct to the requirements of this Conduct Code and applicable federal, state, and local laws.

1.3 Syracuse University considers its Conduct Code to be a statement of minimal expectations and seeks to foster a commitment to the highest standards of ethical behavior by the coherent, consistent, and fair way it enforces its rules and The University views its student conduct process as a learning experience that is intended to result in personal growth, empathy, and understanding, while maintaining an appropriate culture of accountability.

1.4 Timeframes mentioned in these procedures are estimates only. Conduct cases and specific components of cases may take shorter or longer depending on various factors, including but not limited to: the nature and complexity of the case; availability of parties and witnesses; time of year; numbers of parties; and other considerations that may be specific to the case or other University operational demands.

2.1 The University Student Conduct System has jurisdiction over all alleged violations of the Conduct Code by any student or student organization. Students and student organizations may be held responsible for the conduct of their guests. Student organizations include student government bodies such as the Student Government Association. Jurisdiction extends to alleged misconduct that takes place: on University owned or operated property or on property that is the temporary or permanent residence of a student, including Greek Letter Organization chapter houses; at any University sponsored event, program, or activity; and at any location off campus and/or virtually if the alleged misconduct has an adverse impact on the educational mission or well-being of the University Community. The Conduct Code applies from the time of a student’s acceptance of admission until the time they graduate or otherwise permanently separate from the University, including all University breaks and holidays. Admitted students who have not yet matriculated are not entitled to the procedures described in this Student Conduct System Handbook, and the University reserves the right to revoke admission for any pre-matriculation conduct that demonstrates poor citizenship, judgment or character as determined in the University’s sole discretion.

2.2 The Student Conduct System has jurisdiction over complaints against students alleging sex discrimination including sexual and gender-based harassment, assault, and violence. The Syracuse University Sexual Harassment, Abuse, and Assault Prevention Policy applies to all University programs and activities, and the conduct procedures for cases of sexual harassment are available on the University policies website.

2.3 University student conduct proceedings are administrative in nature and independent of any criminal and/or civil legal proceedings, even when those proceedings are concurrently in process. Student conduct proceedings use the Preponderance of the Evidence, or “More Likely Than Not” standard of proof and are intended to enforce the Conduct Code and other University policies at Syracuse University. The University may notify local and federal authorities when a crime is alleged to have been committed. The legal rules of evidence do not apply in the University conduct process.

Certain administrators are delegated authority to take specific administrative actions to promote the safety and well-being of members of the University community and to enforce other administrative policies (e.g., Residential Living, Student Title IX Case Management, Student Engagement, Human Resources, Academic Affairs, Barnes Center Counseling/Health/Recreation).

Community Standards may refer certain issues or concerns to those campus partners who are designated to resolve specific concerns through established policies and procedures as appropriate.

The University may impose certain immediate actions while alleged policy violations are investigated and/or conduct charges are pending. These interim measures are not disciplinary outcomes but are utilized to promote safety and prevent negative incidents and interactions. On occasion when a situation warrants, Community Standards or other University officials may impose safety measures on students or student organizations independent from any conduct case, and even when there is no conduct case.

4.1 The Dean of Students, or designee, determines if an Interim Suspension or other interim measures should be imposed. This action may be taken to promote the safety and well-being of the University community or where a student on conduct probation as a result of a Conduct Code violation commits a similar infraction, demonstrating an unwillingness to comply with University policy. Interim suspension limits a student’s ability to be physically present on University property, participate in classes, and participate in all University activities. Unless there are extenuating circumstances, a student who is interim suspended will be notified of any alleged policy violations within three (3) business days of the transmittal of the interim suspension Alleged policy violations are subject to change depending on the information gathered during an investigation. All efforts will be made to investigate the incident and proceed with the student conduct process in a timely fashion.

4.2 A student who is placed on interim suspension will be given the opportunity to appeal their interim suspension to the Chief Student Experience Officer (CSEO) or designee. Any appeal must be made by the student in writing within five (5) business days of the notice of the interim suspension. Within three (3) business days of receipt of the student’s written appeal, the CSEO (or designee) will review the case, including the student’s written appeal and the Dean of Students or designee’s articulated basis for imposing the interim suspension, to determine whether the interim suspension was appropriate at the time it was issued, and/or if it should be continued or The CSEO’s (or designee’s) decision will be communicated to the student via their Syracuse University email account within three (3) business days. That decision is final and not subject to further institutional process or review.

4.3 If the student does not appeal the interim suspension, the interim suspension remains in place pending the outcome of a resolution by agreement meeting or final outcome of a formal hearing and any subsequent appeal. The interim suspension may be rescinded or modified by the Dean of Students, or designee, at any time, in the Dean’s or designee’s discretion.

Where an interim suspension or other measures are imposed in a case involving the arrest of the Respondent, the University may require the associated criminal matter to be resolved in full prior to the pending conduct case being heard. In cases of alleged sexual misconduct, dating and/or domestic violence, and/or stalking, the University may be required to proceed with the conduct case prior to resolution of an associated criminal matter.

4.4 Investigative Status is an interim measure imposed on a student organization to protect the safety, security, or well-being of all members of the University Community. A student organization placed on Investigative Status is prohibited from engaging in certain organizational activities as defined in the formal written notice from Community Standards and/or Student Engagement until a full investigation and any resulting conduct process are concluded, or until the Investigative Status is otherwise lifted or modified at the discretion of the Director of Community Standards in consultation with appropriate Student Engagement staff. For information about the investigation process, please refer to Part 6.

4.5 No Contact Orders (NCO) are issued to prohibit communication or contact between designated students when there is reason to believe that continued contact is not in the best interest of the students involved. NCOs are not considered disciplinary action and are intended to promote student safety and security, and to prevent future negative interactions between the students.

No Contact Orders prohibit all forms of contact between students including, but not limited to, contact via social media, electronic communications, contact via a third-party proxy and/or in-person contact.

4.6 Temporary No Contact Orders may be issued as a temporary directive to prohibit communication or contact between designated students when there is reason to believe continued contact is not in the best interest of the involved students. Temporary NCOs will be reviewed by Community Standards within two (2) business days of being issued to determine if there is a need to continue the NCO, amend it, or remove it. Both parties will be notified of the decision via their Syracuse University email account.

4.7 When a No Contact Order is issued, all parties will receive a written copy of the NCO electronically via their University email The University official issuing the NCO (usually a staff member in the Student Experience Division) will review the meaning and impact of the NCO with each student. This may occur in person, via teleconference, or phone. All parties named in an NCO are expected to avoid contact with the other. NCOs typically impose mutual restrictions on the parties.

4.8 No Contact Orders remain in place unless: amended or rescinded by the Director of Community Standards, or designee; or upon a request for reconsideration as outlined in Part 4.9; or by the University Conduct Board, Administrative Hearing Officer, or University Appeals Board after the resolution of a conduct case, as appropriate.

4.9 No Contact Orders may be removed or amended at the discretion of the Director of Community Standards, or designee, through request for reconsideration submitted to Community Standards by either party. In the event of a request for reconsideration, either involved student may submit a written request to have the NCO removed or amended. The request must include:

1. A description of the events that caused the NCO to be issued.
2. Names of those listed on the NCO.
3. Reasons why the NCO should be removed or amended.
4. Plans to prevent any negative incidents from occurring between parties listed if the NCO is removed or amended.

When a request for reconsideration has been filed, the other party(ies) to the NCO may be permitted to respond in writing within three (3) business days after the request has been provided to them. Responses must not exceed two (2) pages, double-spaced, using 12-point font and 1-inch margins (not including attachments). Any response may be forwarded by Community Standards to the appealing party.

No Contact Orders will not be considered for removal or amendment if all elements set forth in a, b, c, and d above are not addressed in the request for reconsideration, the initial basis for the NCO stemmed from an incident involving violence or threats of violence, or if there is evidence of the likelihood of future negative incidents between listed parties.

4.10 Violations of No Contact Orders may result in a student’s interim suspension and the filing of new or additional Conduct Code charges.

4.11 No Contact Orders are an interim measure not part of a student’s conduct record unless a violation of the NCO results in a finding of responsibility under the Conduct Code.

4.12 In certain instances, to promote the safety and well-being of the University community, the University may impose an interim residential relocation on students while a conduct case is pending. Interim residential relocation is not a disciplinary action.

4.13 In certain instances, to promote the safety and well-being of the University community, the University may impose interim access restrictions to certain areas/campus facilities and/or events as appropriate, which may include, but is not limited to, residential areas; recreational spaces; dining facilities; athletic spaces; or other spaces as deemed necessary based on the alleged conduct.

NOTE: FOR CASES INVOLVING SEXUAL ASSAULT, STALKING, GENDER-RELATED HARASSMENT, DATING OR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, OR OTHER PROHIBITED CONDUCT AS DEFINED IN THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT, ABUSE, AND ASSAULT PREVENTION POLICY, SEE THE TITLE IX HANDBOOK.

5.1 Any student or student organization may be advised by a Procedural Advisor at any time during the conduct process. Procedural Advisors do not act on behalf of those they advise. Except in cases involving sex-based discrimination or sexual misconduct, persons who may serve as Procedural Advisors are limited to full-time students, faculty, and staff of Syracuse University. Parents/guardians, external attorneys, and fact witnesses may not serve as Procedural Advisors, although students are free to consult with them outside of the formal University processes.

Community Standards maintains a pool of trained University community members who may be available to provide procedural advice and support to any student in the conduct process. A Procedural Advisor from the Community Standards pool is based on availability and is not guaranteed. Students may always elect to choose a Procedural Advisor who is a student, faculty, or staff member outside the pool. Community Standards will assign a Procedural Advisor for all formal hearings unless a student declines or wishes to have an alternate advisor of their choice. In such cases, it is the student’s responsibility to ensure their advisor is available for their scheduled hearing.

5.2 The designated student officer/representative of a recognized fraternity or sorority affiliated with a national or international headquarters may choose to be accompanied in conduct resolution proceedings by a professional employee or volunteer staff advisor designated by that headquarters. The advisor may not be an attorney, or a parent or guardian of any involved student, and may not simultaneously serve as the advisor for any individual student charged in connection with the same incident. Individual students must select an advisor in accordance with Part 5.1 of this policy.

The headquarters advisor’s role is limited to conduct resolution proceedings as outlined in Parts 7 and 8 of this Handbook and does not extend to any phase of the investigation, including interviews or evidence collection. This provision does not expand the organization’s procedural rights beyond those otherwise provided in this Handbook. Any advisor who disrupts the conduct process will be excused and the process will continue in their absence.

5.3 In cases involving sex-based discrimination or sexual misconduct, Complainants and Respondents may be advised by advisors of their choice, including attorneys, throughout all phases of an investigation and conduct process. See the Sexual Harassment, Abuse, and Assault Prevention Policy procedures for more detail.

5.4 The University Conduct Board, University Appeals Board, or an Administrative Hearing Officer may be advised throughout the process by an advisor appointed by the The advisor may be internal or external to the University and may include attorneys.

5.5 An Advisor who becomes disruptive, fails to comply with the expectations outlined in this Handbook, or otherwise impedes the conduct process in any way may be warned and/or excused from further proceedings by the Conduct Officer, University Conduct Board, or Administrative Hearing Officer. The proceedings may continue in the Advisor’s absence.

NOTE: FOR CASES INVOLVING SEXUAL ASSAULT, STALKING, GENDER-RELATED HARASSMENT, DATING OR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, OR OTHER PROHIBITED CONDUCT AS DEFINED IN THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT, ABUSE, AND ASSAULT PREVENTION POLICY, SEE THE TITLE IX HANDBOOK.

6.1 Investigation Process – Once a report has been submitted to Community Standards, it may be referred for further investigation at the discretion of the Director of Community Standards or designee if additional information is needed.

6.2 Investigation Initiated – If an investigation is required, the assigned investigator may contact the reporting party to make them aware that an investigation is taking place. The investigator will attempt to collect essential information from any identified individual who may have relevant knowledge related to the matter under investigation.

6.3 Investigation Interview Notification – If it is determined that interviews are required as a part of an investigation, students will be notified of the date, time, and location of their interview through their Syracuse University email Students who fail to attend their investigation interview meeting may be charged with violating Section 11 of the Conduct Code for failure to comply. Students may elect to have a Procedural Advisor accompany them to any investigation meeting. The role of Procedural Advisors is outlined in Part 5 of this Handbook. Investigation meetings will only be rescheduled once based on advisor availability. It is a student’s responsibility to obtain an advisor prior to their investigation meeting.

6.4 Investigation Interviews – Prior to the start of the investigation interview, an Investigator will review the student’s rights and remind the student that participation is voluntary. If the student chooses to participate in the interview, the student may answer questions asked by the Investigator. Relevant information shared with the Investigator will be part of the investigation report written by the Investigator at the conclusion of the investigation. Students who participate in an investigation interview will be provided the opportunity to review their interview summary statement written by the Investigator at the conclusion of the Investigation. Students shall have at least two (2) business days to review their statement and provide feedback to the Investigator. Both the investigator’s summary and any feedback will be included in the final report.

6.5 Investigation Report – Upon the conclusion of the investigation, an investigation report will be written and submitted to the Director of Community Standards for review. If there is sufficient evidence that a student and/or organization may have violated the Conduct Code, based on the information collected during the investigation process and in the sole discretion of the Director of Community Standards, or designee, the matter will be referred for resolution through the student conduct process outlined in Part 7. If the Director of Community Standards, or designee, determines there is insufficient evidence to establish a Conduct Code violation, the matter will be closed without further action.

6.6 Closed Investigation Notice – Once an investigation has concluded and the final report has been approved, individuals who participated in the investigation shall be notified that it has been closed. If a student and/or student organization is referred to a conduct process to address alleged violations of the Conduct Code, this notice will inform them of that process. The student and/or organization will receive separate communication with the detailed nature of the alleged violation(s) and the next steps in the resolution process.

6.7 Resolution Process – Alleged violations of the Conduct Code resulting from a Student Conduct Investigation are resolved according to Part 7 of the Student Conduct System Handbook.

6.8 Interview Recordings – Students are not permitted to use recording devices (audio and/or video) of any kind during investigation meetings/interviews. Students may, however, make written notes of the meeting.

NOTE: FOR CASES INVOLVING SEXUAL ASSAULT, STALKING, GENDER-RELATED HARASSMENT, DATING OR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, OR OTHER PROHIBITED CONDUCT AS DEFINED IN THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT, ABUSE, AND ASSAULT PREVENTION POLICY, SEE THE TITLE IX HANDBOOK.

7.1 Alleged violations of the Conduct Code or other University policies may be reported to Community Standards by anyone. All reports are reviewed by the Director of Community Standards or designee to determine if the alleged conduct, if proven, would violate the Conduct Code or other University policy. Reports may be dismissed outright, referred to an investigator if additional information is needed, or referred to a conduct officer for possible resolution by agreement.

7.2 When there is enough information to move forward with the conduct process, the case will proceed to resolution by agreement, and the subject(s) of the report will receive a meeting notice through their Syracuse University email. The letter will include a summary of the alleged incident, the alleged violations of the Conduct Code, information regarding support from Procedural Advisors, the process to request disability accommodations, the process for requesting a copy of the report, and the date/time/location of the meeting.

7.3 Students or student organizations may be accompanied by a Procedural Advisor during any meeting regarding resolution of their case. Procedural Advisors may be any faculty member, staff member, student, or, in the case of a fraternity or sorority with a national or international headquarters, a headquarters staff representative or volunteer advisor. External attorneys are not permitted to serve as Procedural Advisors as outlined in Part 5 of this Handbook.

7.4 Resolution by Agreement meetings are not recorded, and recording devices are not permitted. However, students may take notes during the At the beginning of a resolution meeting, a student will be provided with the following information by a conduct officer:

1. Student’s rights and responsibilities.
2. Overview of the conduct process.
3. Resolution options (e.g., resolving with the conduct officer at the first meeting, request to schedule secondary/follow-up meeting, or referral to a formal hearing).
4. The student’s right to decline the resolution by agreement proposed by the conduct officer and proceed to a formal hearing.

7.5 A Resolution by Agreement meeting may result in one of the following outcomes:

1. A student(s)/organization(s) and conduct officer mutually agree on an outcome, including agreement on any policy violations as well as any appropriate sanctions outlined in Part 9 if there has been a policy violation.
2. A resolution between the student(s)/organization(s) and the conduct officer is not reached and the student(s)/organization(s) is referred to a formal hearing with a University Conduct Board or Administrative Hearing Officer as outlined in Part 8 of this Handbook.

7.6 If a student(s)/organization(s) does not attend the scheduled resolution meeting without prior notice to Community Standards or elects not to participate in the Resolution by Agreement process, a decision may be rendered in the student’s/student organization’s absence, which could include referral to a formal hearing.

7.7 A student(s)/organization(s) may request that a resolution by agreement be reconsidered within seven (7) business days of resolving their case. After seven (7) business days, the resolution by agreement is considered Timely requests for reconsideration shall be reviewed by the Director of Community Standards, or designee.

The Director or designee may modify or uphold the original resolution by agreement terms, or refer the matter for a formal hearing as appropriate. Decisions of the Director of Community Standards, or designee, are considered final unless the matter is referred to a formal hearing.

NOTE: FOR CASES INVOLVING SEXUAL ASSAULT, STALKING, GENDER-RELATED HARASSMENT, DATING OR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, OR OTHER PROHIBITED CONDUCT AS DEFINED IN THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT, ABUSE, AND ASSAULT PREVENTION POLICY, SEE THE TITLE IX HANDBOOK.

8.1 Conduct cases that are not resolved through a resolution by agreement will proceed to a formal hearing before the University Conduct Board or an Administrative Hearing Officer. The University Conduct Board or Administrative Hearing Officer is responsible for considering all relevant information, determining facts, responsibility, and sanctions, if appropriate.

8.2 Where there are multiple student Respondents and/or student organization Respondents in the same case, Community Standards may propose a consolidated hearing for all Respondents participating in the formal hearing process. The University Conduct Board/Administrative Hearing Officer shall make individual decisions for each Respondent based on the specific information and evidence related to their respective alleged violations of the Student Conduct Code.

8.3 The Respondent(s) will be given written notice of the charges stating: the incident report(s) and any associated evidence; the alleged Student Conduct Code violations; the procedures to be used in resolving the charges; and the date, time, and location of the hearing. Notice will be emailed at least five (5) business days prior to the hearing to the Respondent’s Syracuse University email account. The Respondent(s) will be granted access to the case file for review.

8.4 The sequence of proceedings in the formal hearing is typically as follows:

1. introductions and reading of the complaint;
2. reading of the alleged charges against the Respondent, and the Respondent’s response to these charges;
3. opening statements;
4. presentation of information/witnesses by the Case Presenter, questioning of participating parties/witnesses through the Hearing Chair/Administrative Hearing Officer;
5. presentation of information/witnesses by the Respondent, questioning of the Respondent through the Hearing Chair/Administrative Hearing Officer;
6. closing statement by the Case Presenter;
7. closing statement by the Respondent.

8.5 The Respondent(s) and Case Presenter may object to the participation of a Board member due to conflict of interest. Any objection will be decided by the Hearing Chair, or by vote of the majority of the Board if the objection is to the Hearing Chair’s participation. If there is an objection to an Administrative Hearing Officer, the objection should be communicated to the Director of Community Standards.

8.6 At the conclusion of the hearing, all parties, including the Case Presenter, are dismissed, and the University Conduct Board/Administrative Hearing Officer begins deliberations regarding responsibility, and if appropriate, sanction(s).

8.7 The University Conduct Board is a three (3) member panel generally comprised of students, although faculty, staff members, or external professionals may serve as determined by the Director of Community Standards, or designee. The University Conduct Board members receive training each year and are advised by a trained designee of the Director of Community Standards, who may be internal or external to the University.

Administrative Hearing Officers, who may be faculty or staff members or external professionals, are appointed by the Director of Community Standards and receive training on the University Conduct System.

8.8 An audio-visual recording will be made for all formal hearings. Recordings will not include deliberations. The Respondent(s) may request that a written transcript of these recordings be made at the expense of the Respondent(s) (except in cases of disability accommodation) or have access to the recordings by arrangement with the Director of Community Standards. Printed transcripts will be redacted as required by Federal privacy laws and University policy prior to being released. Additional recording devices (audio and/or video) of any kind are not permitted for use during formal resolution hearings. Students may take notes during the  proceedings.

8.9 If a Respondent(s) or Case Presenter would like to call witnesses regarding the facts of the case, names of potential witnesses and a summary of the facts to which they will testify must be submitted to Community Standards by the date outlined in the formal hearing Case Presenters and Respondents are limited to five (5) witnesses each for a hearing. If a Respondent(s) or Case Presenter believes they need the testimony of more than five (5) witnesses, these additional witnesses may submit a written statement for consideration. Witness lists will be made available to the Respondent(s) and Case Presenter. Character witnesses/written statements are not permitted.

The Hearing Chair/Administrative Hearing Officer will have the discretion to allow or exclude witnesses proposed by either party when the information offered by a witness would be duplicative or irrelevant, or the witness would unnecessarily compromise the confidentiality of the hearing. Community Standards will make reasonable efforts to request the attendance of witnesses, but no witness may be compelled to attend any formal hearing.

8.10 If a party fails to appear, the hearing may proceed in their absence or be rescheduled at the discretion of the University Conduct Board/Hearing Chair/Administrative Hearing Officer. In cases where parties are unable to appear, alternative means for participation may be made available at the discretion of the Director of Community Standards or designee.

8.11 All parties are expected to be respectful of the proceedings and the rights of all individuals involved. It is the responsibility of each party to ensure advisors, witnesses, and other affiliates act in a respectful manner. The Hearing Chair/Administrative Hearing Officer may discontinue the hearing and forward the case for administrative resolution by the Director of Community Standards, or designee, when the behavior of any participant might be detrimental to the outcome of the hearing.

Attendance at hearings is limited to the University Conduct Board/Administrative Hearing Officer and their advisor, the Case Presenter, any parties immediately involved, and their Procedural Advisors. Witnesses are permitted in the hearing solely for their own testimony. Witnesses should not discuss their testimony with any other witnesses who have not yet testified.

Only the University Conduct Board/Administrative Hearing Officer and their advisor(s) are permitted in deliberations.

For training purposes, the Director of Community Standards may invite new University Conduct Board members, who will be subject to the same confidentiality requirements as the University Conduct Board members hearing and deciding the case, to observe a formal hearing.

8.12 At the hearing, parties are expected to provide all relevant information, including statements, witnesses, and any tangible/physical evidence for consideration. Failure to provide relevant information available at the time of the hearing may not later be used as grounds for appeal as outlined in Part 10. Relevance of information may be determined prior to or during a formal hearing.

8.13 The University Conduct Board/Administrative Hearing Officer may ask relevant questions at any time.

8.14 The Respondent and the Case Presenter will have the opportunity to ask relevant questions indirectly of the other participating parties and witness(es) through the Hearing Chair/Administrative Hearing Officer if it is deemed relevant to the matter(s) at issue.

8.15 As this is an administrative University process, formal rules of evidence found in legal proceedings do not Any information or statement may be admitted (including hearsay) at the discretion of the Hearing Chair/Administrative Hearing Officer.

8.16 After the closing statements, the University Conduct Board/Administrative Hearing Officer will deliberate on and determine the finding of responsibility for each alleged violation. University Conduct Board decisions on responsibility are made by a majority vote of the Board members using a Preponderance of the Evidence, or “more likely than not” standard.

8.17 If a student or organization is found responsible for any violations, the University Conduct Board/Administrative Hearing Officer will consider appropriate sanctions as outlined in Part 9 of this Handbook.

8.18 Decisions of the University Conduct Board/Administrative Hearing Officer are reviewed and confirmed by the Director of Community Standards, or designee. The Director can, as appropriate, interview any participant in an earlier proceeding, modify the decision, alter the sanction, or return the case to the Board for further process. Following the review and confirmation of the decision, the Respondent will receive written notice of the confirmed decision within ten (10) business days after the hearing has concluded.

8.19 Respondents may appeal formal resolution hearing decisions using the procedures outlined in Part 10 of this Handbook.

The primary goals of the University Student Conduct System are education and accountability. In addition to educational sanctions, the University may issue sanctions that impact a student or student organization’s status at the University. All sanctions are official actions of the University. Failure to comply with sanctions or with specific conditions related to the safety and security of any persons or property while a case is pending may result in further conduct charges under Section 11 of the Conduct Code.

Decisions and sanctions may become effective immediately, except when an appeal is pending, unless otherwise stated by the Director of Community Standards, or designee, who may implement sanctions during any pending appeal process in order to protect the safety and well-being of the campus community. The timing of any sanctions will be specified in the written notice of the decision.

9.1 Sanctions are assigned based on the context and nature of the violations, the impact and continuing risk, if any, to the community, and the Respondent’s conduct record and behavior throughout the conduct process. Specifically, the following factors will be considered when determining sanctions:

1. the extent of harm caused or impact on individuals and the community (living environment, University community, and the surrounding community) including the level of intervention necessary;
2. the potential for ongoing risk to the student, other individuals, the community, or property, or the potential for ongoing disruption of University operations;
3. the student’s disciplinary record and history of past conduct violations and sanctions, including but not limited to, sanctions in prior similar University conduct cases involving similar or analogous misconduct;
4. the student’s intent, remorse, cooperation, and willingness to take responsibility for their actions;
5. evidence that the student’s conduct was motivated by bias regarding an individual or group’s real or perceived protected identity;
6. whether the student or student organization engaged in help-seeking behavior; and
7. whether the Respondent was in a position of organizational leadership, mentorship, or trust at the time of the violation, and whether the conduct represented a failure to act according to the expectations and requirements of such position, including requirements set forth in the Conduct Code.

9.2 The following sanctions, or any combination thereof, may be applied to any individual student or student organization for violations of the Conduct Code and related University policies:

1. Educational: A primary goal of the University Student Conduct System is to help students learn and grow within a system of personal accountability. Because of this, Conduct Officers and University Conduct Board/Administrative Hearing Officers may assign sanctions that are tailored to the specific situation and designed to be a meaningful learning experience. Examples of educational sanctions include, but are not limited to, community service, community involvement assignments, decision-making assignments, reflection opportunities, substance education, skills or educational workshops, monetary restitution, and research and writing assignments.
   1. Growth & Accountability Agreements are an educational outcome that may be offered at the sole discretion of the Conduct Officer for first-time alcohol or cannabis use or possession, and certain other minor Residential Living Policy violations.This outcome is not available for:
      • • Incidents involving property damage, injury, non-compliance with staff or first responders, or community disruption.
        • Any other violation of the Conduct Code.
        • Any incident where conduct probation, suspension, or expulsion is a possible outcome.

      For this outcome to be considered, the Respondent must take active accountability for their decisions and agree to complete a pre-determined accountability plan focused on personal growth and education regarding substance use and/or the residential policy in question. If the Respondent completes the plan as assigned, no formal violation is noted on their conduct record.

      Failure to complete all elements of an accountability plan will result in the matter being referred for a separate student conduct process for failure to comply and result in a conduct record at that time.

      Community Standards retains sole discretion to decline to offer this option in any case, including where aggravating factors are present.

      Students who have previously received a Growth & Accountability Agreement are not eligible for a second, regardless of the incident. The prior outcome will be treated as part of the student’s conduct history and may be considered in future sanctioning decisions.

2. Access Restriction: Restriction to certain areas/campus facilities and/or events as appropriate, which may include, but is not limited to, residential areas, recreational spaces, dining facilities, athletic spaces, or other spaces as warranted based on the Respondent’s conduct.
3. Residential Warning: A formal warning on behalf of the residential living program intended to clearly document in a student’s disciplinary file that the student’s behavior is unacceptable. The length of this status will be determined by the Conduct Officer or hearing body/official.
4. Residential Probation: A student is no longer in good standing within the University’s residential living Further violations may result in the loss of eligibility to live in or visit the University’s residence and/or residential dining facilities.
5. Residential Relocation/Suspension/Expulsion: A student is no longer eligible to live in or visit some or all the University’s residential and/or dining facilities. A residential relocation involves the reassignment of a student’s living unit within University housing and usually prohibits the student from returning to the residential area associated with the former living A residential suspension or expulsion involves the student’s removal from University housing altogether. These restrictions may extend for a specific period, until the completion of specific conditions, or permanently. These restrictions may be limited to a specific residential facility or applied to all facilities.
6. Social Probation: In response to a breach of specific expectations by a student organization, its primary effect is to suspend a privilege related to the nature of the offense and/or restrict access to specific campus facilities or programs.
7. Conduct Warning: A formal warning on behalf of the University intended to clearly document in a student’s or student organization’s disciplinary file that their behavior is unacceptable. The length of this status will be determined by the Conduct Officer or University Conduct Board/Administrative Hearing Officer.
8. Conduct Probation: An escalated warning that allows a student or student organization to remain enrolled or recognized by the University, respectively, but under specific conditions. It is a signal that future violations could result in suspension or expulsion. While on conduct probation, students are not considered in good standing and are not permitted to hold or run for leadership positions including, but not limited to, resident assistants (RAs), peer leaders or mentors, orientation leaders, Student Government Association leaders, or hold leadership positions in recognized clubs and organizations, including professional and social fraternities and sororities.

   For student organizations on conduct probation, any additional violations of the Code could result in suspension or loss of University recognition. For all students, any further violations while on conduct probation may lead to immediate suspension or expulsion from the University.

   The length of this status will be determined by the Conduct Officer or University Conduct Board/Administrative Hearing Officer.

9. Suspension in Abeyance: A sanction in which suspension from the University has been formally imposed but is not immediately enforced. The student is permitted to remain enrolled; however, the suspension will be activated if the student/student organization is found responsible for any additional violation of the Conduct Code of similar or greater severity, fails to complete any assigned conditions by the stated deadlines, or otherwise violates any of the terms of the original sanction.

   Students on this status are not considered in good standing and are not permitted to hold or run for leadership positions including, but not limited to, resident assistants (RAs), peer leaders or mentors, orientation leaders, Student Government Association leaders, or hold leadership positions in recognized clubs and organizations, including professional and social fraternities and sororities.

10. Suspension: A student’s immediate involuntary withdrawal from the University, or for a student organization, the loss of University recognition and related privileges, for a stated period of time as determined by the Conduct Officer or University Conduct Board/Administrative Hearing Officer. A suspended student or student organization is prohibited from any presence or activity on University-owned, operated, or controlled property, including, but not limited to, University-owned property leased to a non-University affiliated party, and from participation in any class or program offered by Syracuse University.If a student is issued a sanction of suspension after completing all degree requirements, but prior to degree conferral, their degree will not be conferred until the period of suspension is completed.The University may require proof of completion or impose specific terms/conditions before a student is eligible to return from a suspension status.
11. Expulsion: The permanent separation of the student or student organization from the University, its programs and facilities. It is the most severe disciplinary action the University Student Conduct System can impose. Students expelled prior to degree conferral will not have their degree conferred.An expelled student or student organization is prohibited from any presence or activity on University-owned, operated, or controlled property, including but not limited to, University-owned property leased to a non-University affiliated party, and from participation in any class, program, or event offered by Syracuse University.

9.3 Sanctioning Guidelines

These guidelines are provided as general information to promote consistency and help students understand the range of possible outcomes for common violations of the Student Conduct Code. They are recommendations, not mandatory minimums or maximums, and do not predetermine any specific outcome.

Each case is evaluated individually, based on its own facts and circumstances. Where these guidelines refer to an “initial,” “elevated,” or “pattern response,” those references are meant only to illustrate how factors, including but not limited to prior conduct history, may inform a progressive response.

This is not a three-strikes policy, and no set number of violations automatically triggers a mandatory outcome. Where prior conduct history is considered, it is not used to trigger automatic consequences; rather, it helps the decision maker understand the full context and respond appropriately to the situation.

All sanctions are considered educational in nature. Their purpose is to help students understand the impact of their actions on themselves, others, and the broader academic community, while supporting personal growth, accountability, and responsible decision making. At the same time, sanctions are also intended to protect the safety and well-being of the campus community.

These guidelines do not limit the University’s discretion. The University retains the authority to impose a greater or lesser sanction than what is described here, based on the facts and circumstances of each individual case.

9.4 Sanctioning Guidelines for Substance-Related Violations

9.5 Sanctioning Guidelines for Weapons-Related Violations

9.6 Sanctioning Guidelines for Theft or Damage

9.7 Sanctioning Guidelines for Disorderly Conduct, Bullying, and/or Reckless Behavior

9.8 Sanctioning Guidelines for Failure to Comply

9.9 Sanctioning Guidelines for Unauthorized Entry

9.10 Sanctioning Guidelines for Violence-Related Violations

9.11 Sanctioning Guidelines for Safety and Fire-Related Violations

 9.12 Sanctioning Guidelines for Gender-Related Violence/Harassment

9.13  Sanctioning Guidelines for Bias-Related Violations

9.14 Sanctioning Guidelines for Hazing-Related Violations

 9.15 Sanctioning Guidelines for Student Leaders

 9.16 Sanctioning Guidelines for Perpetuating/Affiliating with an Unrecognized Organization

NOTE: FOR CASES INVOLVING SEXUAL ASSAULT, STALKING, GENDER-RELATED HARASSMENT, DATING OR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, OR OTHER PROHIBITED CONDUCT AS DEFINED IN THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT, ABUSE, AND ASSAULT PREVENTION POLICY, SEE THE TITLE IX HANDBOOK.

10.1 Decisions of the University Conduct Board or Administrative Hearing Officer are effective immediately, unless a written notice of intention to appeal has been received by Community Standards within four (4) business days after the decision is transmitted to the Respondent via their Syracuse University email account.

10.2 Appeals must be based on one or more of the following:

1. New information is provided that was not reasonably available at the time of the original hearing.
2. Procedural error that can be shown to have had a detrimental impact on the outcome of the hearing.
3. Grossly inappropriate sanction having no reasonable relationship to the charges.

10.3 The Respondent may submit a written appeal of the decision of the University Conduct Board or Administrative Hearing Officer no later than three (3) business days after the Respondent’s transmittal of the notice of intention to appeal to Community Standards. Extensions for appeals may be granted at the discretion of the Director of Community Standards, or designee, in the event there are extenuating circumstances. All appeals must be authored and submitted by the Respondent. Appeal submissions must not be more than two (2) pages per ground for appeal set forth in Part 10.2. Submissions which are not authored and submitted by the Respondent, and/or exceed the page requirement are subject to dismissal by the Dean of Students, or designee, at their discretion. Alternatively, the Dean of Students may return the written appeal to the Respondent with instructions to revise the appeal to make it compliant, in the Dean of Students’, or designee’s, discretion.

A student will be notified of the administrative dismissal of an appeal. If an appeal is administratively dismissed at this stage, the original decision will be considered final and there will be no further opportunity for appeal.

Attachments which support the arguments made in the appeal and are relevant to the case at hand do not count toward the page requirement but may not exceed ten (10) pages. Character statements/evidence shall not be considered in the appeals process.

Appeals submitted to Community Standards will be reviewed by the Dean of Students, or designee, to determine if the Respondent’s narrative supports the selected ground(s) for appeal listed in Part 10.2. The Dean of Students, or designee, may conduct an initial review of the arguments made in an appeal submission as well as any supporting documentation provided to determine if the submission articulates facts or information that would meet one of the valid grounds for appeal.

If the appeal is timely and contains sufficient information, it will be forwarded to the University Appeals Board within five (5) business days of the completion of the Dean of Students, or designee’s, review. Referral of an appeal to the University Appeals Board does not indicate the appeal will be granted, only that it will be considered.

10.4 The University Appeals Board reviews timely and compliant appeals of decisions made by the University Conduct Board and Administrative Hearing Officers. The board has three (3) members who can be students, faculty, staff, or external professionals. Community Standards determines the makeup of each board. The University Appeals Board is advised by the Director of Community Standards, or a designee.

10.5 After reviewing the appeal, the University Appeals Board may: affirm the decision; modify the decision; reduce the sanction; or return the case to a University Conduct Board/Administrative Hearing Officer for further If the University Appeals Board believes the sanction imposed is insufficient in light of the misconduct at issue in the case, it shall return the case to the University Conduct Board/Administrative Hearing Officer for reconsideration of sanction(s).

10.6 The University Appeals Board makes its recommended decision based on the written submissions and will communicate it to the Chief Student Experience Officer within five (5) business days of the University Appeals Board meeting to review the appeal.

10.7 Recommended decisions of the University Appeals Board will be final when reviewed and confirmed by the Chief Student Experience Officer (CSEO), or designee. The CSEO, or designee, may: interview any participant in an earlier proceeding; modify the decision; alter the sanctions imposed; or return the case to the University Appeals Board or another hearing board for further Decisions of the CSEO, or designee, are final and no further University review is permitted. Review and confirmation by the CSEO, or designee, will be made within five (5) business days after the recommended decision of the University Appeals Board is transmitted to the CSEO, absent extenuating circumstances as determined in the CSEO’s discretion.

11.1 Syracuse University reserves the right to modify its conduct procedures and appeals processes with written notice to the Respondent in circumstances where, in the University’s sole discretion, the procedures described herein are insufficient to meet the objectives of educating and protecting members of the University. This includes, without limitation, when classes are not in session, while any individual involved is studying abroad, during winter or summer breaks, when safety and security so demand, or when special expertise is needed to ensure a well-reasoned decision. Modified procedures will provide students with required elements of fundamental fairness.

12.1 Syracuse University encourages all community members to care for themselves and others. Therefore, when a student or student organization initiates help from a campus or community resource for medical assistance related to alcohol and other drugs, the health and safety of the student at risk will be the University’s priority.

12.2 The student receiving medical assistance, and the student(s) or student organization who called for help, will not be referred to Community Standards for alleged violations of alcohol and other drug policies if the following apply:

1. The students involved cooperate with staff and first responders by providing honest and complete answers to their questions; and
2. The students involved meet with a member of Student Outreach and Support for a follow-up non-disciplinary (educational) meeting. Student Outreach and Support will reach out to students involved to set up a time to meet. 

12.3 Failure to meet the two (2) requirements above may result in a referral to Community Standards.

12.4 A student receiving medical assistance, and the student(s) or student organization who initiates help, are eligible to use the Medical Amnesty Policy on more than one However, repeated use of the policy may be a cause of higher concern for an individual’s wellbeing. Students involved in repeated use of this policy may be referred to the Barnes Center at the Arch for evaluation or Community Standards for possible conduct violations depending upon the relevant circumstances, in the judgment of the Dean of Students or designee.

12.5 The Medical Amnesty Policy only extends to situations in which medical assistance is sought for substance-related concerns (alcohol and other drugs) and does not prevent referral to Community Standards for other possible violations of the Conduct Code.

12.6 For information on amnesty related to reports of sexual assault, sexual harassment, stalking or dating/domestic violence, see Amnesty for Reporting Students in the Sexual Harassment, Abuse, and Assault Prevention Policy.

13.1 A student’s request to access and inspect their disciplinary records maintained by Syracuse University is handled in accordance with the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) of 1974.

Syracuse University will notify parents or guardians of conduct issues involving minor (non-adult) students.

Except in unusual circumstances, Syracuse University will notify parents or guardians of conduct issues involving tax dependent students as follows:

1. In an emergency, including when there is an imminent risk to a student’s health and safety;
2.  After final outcome and finding of responsibility in all alcohol and drug-related violations for students under the age of 21; and/or
3. After final outcome and finding of responsibility in all violations resulting in conduct probation, removal from University housing, suspension, or expulsion.
4. In instances of concerning or repetitive substance use, regardless of age, which result in medical amnesty as outlined in Part 12.

13.2 Disciplinary records are retained for seven (7) years from the date of the student’s most recent violation or until one (1) year after the student has graduated from the University, whichever is longer. Records of students suspended, expelled, prohibited from future enrollment, or otherwise withdrawn for disciplinary reasons are retained Records retention policies for academic dishonesty cases may vary and are maintained by the Academic Integrity Office.

1. Students found to be responsible for conduct violations that result in suspension or expulsion as a result of behaviors including, but not limited to acts of physical violence, sexual misconduct, stalking, dating/domestic violence, hazing, acts which cause injury to others, or those which may also be classified as reportable under the Clery Act will have the following notation listed on their transcript:
   1. In cases of suspension – “Administrative Withdrawal – University Initiated – Suspended after a finding of responsibility for a Student Conduct Code violation.”
   2. In cases of expulsion: “Administrative Withdrawal – University Initiated –Expelled after a finding of responsibility for a Student Conduct Code violation.”
2. If a student alleged to have been involved in an incident that could result in a sanction of suspension or expulsion, withdraws from the University with an investigation or conduct case pending, the following notation will be listed on their University transcript: “Administrative Withdrawal – University Initiated – Withdrew with Conduct Charges Pending.”
3. In the event that a student elects to withdraw with charges pending and the case is later resolved, the notation will be updated accordingly and reflect the resolution. If a student is found “Not Responsible,” the notation will be amended to read “Administrative Withdrawal – University Initiated”.

13.3 The University may place a temporary notation on the transcript of a student who is currently enrolled in instances where there is a pending University investigation and/or conduct process that has not yet concluded. The temporary notation shall indicate there is a “Conduct Matter Pending.” This notation does not indicate any finding or determination of responsibility. In the event that a student withdraws, or if they are found responsible and suspended or expelled after a full process, this notation will be updated as outlined in Part 13.2.

13.4 Suspended students may appeal the notation on their transcript one (1) year after the completion of their suspension to the Director of Community Standards, or designee under the following conditions:

1. It has been a minimum of one (1) academic year since a student’s suspension period concluded.
2. There have been no further conduct violations by the student since their suspension. If a student is responsible for any additional conduct-related incidents which took place after the start of the suspension, appeals will not be considered.
3. The student has completed all readmission and/or other sanction requirements at the time of the request.
4. Requests for removal of a suspension notation should be submitted in writing to Community Standards using the Transcript Notation Appeal Form. Submissions should contain the following:
   • A brief description of the incident and the sanction(s) imposed.
   • Detailed reflection on the student’s actions, including how they have impacted the student as well as others.
   • An account of the student’s decision-making and behavior since the incident.
   • An explanation as to why the student believes the transcript notation indicating suspension should be removed from their transcript.
   • Any optional supporting material which reinforces the student’s request and/or demonstrates their acceptance of accountability and growth since the incident.All requests will be responded to in writing. If the request is granted by Community Standards, the suspension notation will be removed. An “Administrative Withdrawal – University Initiated” notation will remain on a transcript to reflect a student’s time away from the University. If the request is denied, the student may appeal to the Dean of Students, whose decision shall be final.
5. If a notation appeal is granted, it only removes the notation on the academic transcript. It does not remove the University’s conduct record for the incident and the outcome, which is maintained separately by Community Standards.

13.5 Expungement Policy:

A student found responsible for violating University policy may request expungement from the Director of Community Standards, or designee.

A student may initiate the request by completing the Request for Expungement Form with Community Standards.

A student is eligible to request expungement if:

1. The student has completed all assigned sanctions by the assigned deadlines;
2. The student is in good standing with the University; and
3. The student has remained free of any Conduct Code violations for two (2) full consecutive academic semesters since the violation at issue.

A student whose violation occurs the semester in which they graduate may apply for expungement if they have met all other requirements and can demonstrate they are applying to professional or graduate school.

Should a student be found responsible for a new violation of the Conduct Code after an expungement has been granted, the original conduct record may be restored, and the previous record may be considered in determining appropriate sanctions in the new case.

Expungement will not be granted for:

• Records of expulsion
• Incidents involving violations determined to be motivated by bias
• Academic Integrity violations
• Incidents involving participation in acts of hazing as defined in University policy
• Incidents involving sale or distribution of drugs/controlled substances
• Incidents causing significant damage to property
• Incidents causing significant injury
• Incidents involving violations of the University’s Sexual Assault, Stalking, Gender-Related Harassment, Dating or Domestic Violence, and/or Sexual Harassment, Abuse, and Assault Prevention policies

All requests are subject to approval by the Director of Community Standards or designee. Expungement requests that are denied may be appealed to the Dean of Students, or designee, whose decision shall be final.

14.1The University reserves the right to place a hold on a Respondent’s academic records until an investigation and subsequent conduct case (if any) is resolved. The hold may prevent the student from registering for classes, obtaining a copy of their academic transcript, or conferral of their degree.

A student who attempts to withdraw from the University rather than participate in the conduct process may be classified as having been withdrawn for disciplinary reasons. This status will be noted on the student’s transcript as “Withdrew with Conduct Charges Pending.” A student who withdraws under these circumstances is not permitted to enter onto Syracuse University-owned, operated, or controlled property, including but not limited to, University-owned land leased to a non-University affiliated party, and may not participate in any course or program offered by Syracuse University until the pending matter is resolved.

15.1 In order to obtain a Syracuse University degree (undergraduate or graduate), students must be in good standing with the University. That includes a requirement that all matters pending before the University Student Conduct System have been fully and finally resolved including full satisfaction of any sanctions imposed. Students who are not in good standing will not be granted a degree, may have limited access to transcripts, and may not be eligible to participate in graduation ceremonies.

16.1 Syracuse University reserves the right to place students on involuntary leaves of absence, consistent with the University’s policies governing leaves of absence.